If you've looked into aircon energy savings, you've seen wildly different per-degree figures. A Singapore technician says 9–11%. A Philippine government source says 6–8%. The US DOE implies about 5%. Here's why, and which figure to use.
| Source | Cited figure | Temperature unit | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Department of Energy | ~3%/°F | Fahrenheit | US temperate climate homes, cooling season |
| Philippine Dept. of Energy | 6–8%/°C | Celsius | Tropical, per degree below 25°C |
| Sky Blue Aircon (Singapore) | 9–11%/°C | Celsius | Singapore HVAC practice |
| DLCuration (Singapore) | 3–5%/°C | Celsius | General Singapore guidance |
| Mr. Aircon Philippines | 6–8%/°C | Celsius | Philippine households, per DOE citation |
The US DOE's ~3% per degree Fahrenheit converts to approximately 5.4% per degree Celsius (since 1°C = 1.8°F, and 3% × 1.8 ≈ 5.4%). This alone eliminates much of the apparent gap between US figures and tropical-market figures. The DOE figure is frequently misquoted as "3% per degree" without specifying Fahrenheit, which leads people to underestimate the Celsius-equivalent saving.
The savings per degree depend on the difference between outdoor and indoor temperature. In a tropical climate, the outdoor temperature is often 30–34°C. Dropping your setpoint from 26°C to 25°C forces the unit to maintain a larger gap against a hot outdoor environment, requiring proportionally more compressor work than the same change in a temperate climate where outdoor temperature might be 22°C. This is why tropical-market sources consistently cite higher per-degree figures than temperate-market sources.
Some sources measure savings relative to the unit's energy use at a specific baseline temperature. Others measure relative to total household electricity. A 10% reduction in aircon-only consumption translates to roughly 3–6% of total household consumption if aircon represents 30–60% of the bill. This accounting difference can make the same physical saving look like a very different percentage depending on how the study frames it.
The per-degree saving is not perfectly linear. The gain from going from 18°C to 19°C (already very cold, large gap to outdoor temperature) is larger in absolute energy terms than going from 25°C to 26°C (closer to ambient). Studies that measure the saving starting at 18°C will show higher per-degree figures than studies starting at 25°C.
For tropical Asia — Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, India — 6–10% per degree Celsius is the most applicable range. It is directly cited by the Philippine Department of Energy for exactly this context, consistent with the Celsius-converted DOE figure, and aligns with Singapore HVAC practitioner guidance. The 9–11% figures from some Singapore sources may be measured from lower starting setpoints (e.g. 18°C or 20°C baselines) where the gain per degree is larger.
Our calculator uses a temperature multiplier table derived from HVAC industry consensus (approximately 7% per degree in the 22°C–26°C range) rather than a single flat percentage, since the relationship is not perfectly linear. The 6–10% range is appropriate as a rule-of-thumb for explaining the mechanism; the table provides more precise estimates for each specific temperature step.